"Women Suck Ass" changed to "Stupid Women"

Looks like the anti-free speech morons at google are censoring or "shadow banning" my web log.  I did a google search for "women suck". Only 14 pages came up, but none of them had a link to my blog (despite the title of my blog literally being WOMEN SUCK). The search listed other sites that didn't even appear to be relevant to the topic.

I'm guessing some feminazi cunts must have seen my website and complained to google [I noticed that two of my early posts, where I discuss anti-male websites such as "I hate men.org", had a lot of views (relatively speaking), so maybe it was one of them].

Because I use actual news sources to write my blogs, the google feminazis can't really say it's "Fake News", and so can't take it down for that reason.

I couldn't use the name "womensuck.blogspot" or "women-suck.blogspot" because those were already taken, so I originally had to title my blog "women suck ass.blogspot".  If I did a seach for "womensuckass" and some keywords from my articles, a link to my blog would come up (but I had to be specific). Now however, it won't come up at all.

I have changed the name of my web log (blog) from "womensuckass.blogspot" to "stupid-women.blogspot".  I have decided to change it for two reasons:

#1. doing a search for "women suck ass" resulted in a bunch of porn sites, which I did not want, and

#2. changing the name of your blog results your blog not showing up easily on searches (this happened when I originally tried to change the name of my blog over a year ago; so I changed it back to its original name, womensuckass.blogspot). However, since my blog isn't showing up anyway, there is no longer an incentive for me to keep the old name, which inadvertently makes porn sites show up.

While "women suck" and "stupid women" have a different feel, maybe a search for "stupid women" (rather than "women suck ass") will yield better results (if at all).

I don't expect anyone to be able to find my web log ever again; so if you are one of the lucky people to have stumbled upon my website, CONGRATULATIONS.  If you happen to like what you see (most people won't), then I suggest you bookmark it or keep a copy of the webaddress somewhere).

Lastly, since it clearly needs repeating, I DON'T HATE WOMEN.  I just hate SOME women. Many women really SUCK. Even other women think SOME women suck. Hence the title of my web log. However, titling my blog "Some Women Suck" isn't very catchy.

Cheers,

Mr. SUKRAM

# Women Suck
# Stupid Women
# Women are stupid

(p.s. I will begin including hashtags like this in hopes they will help this blog show up on searches. No offense meant to all the nice women out there).

Happy (belated) Father's Day - feminists suck

Seems like feminazis (feminists) and stupid women in industry aren't content with making money and/or trying to provide a quality product - now they are trying to preach to us and brainwash us.

[and just to be clear - I don't mean all women in industry are stupid; I mean there are women in industry who happen to be stupid - there is a difference, but I have to put this disclaimer since people get confused because they don't think critically]

What makes this even more ridiculous is that their loony ideas have absolutely nothing to do with the product they are selling.

There is a 'hashtag' called "#HappyFathersDayMom".  The basic idea is that not everyone grows up with a father and so women supposedly have to play both roles.

First of all, moms are not dads. Besides the fact that females are not males and never can be (I'm talking to you, trangenders), females and males have different perspectives on things and often times approach things differently.

Being a single mom does not also make you a dad. It just makes you a mom that has to do way more work than you might normally do.

Second, it is callous and disrespectful.  I can't even imagine the outrage from feminists and women if somebody created a 'hashtag' called "HappyMothersDayDad".  It would be considered "sexist" and "an attack on women".  It would be accused of demeaning the role of mothers. But these politically-correct social justice warrior millennnial idiots are too dumb to see the irony in this.

If you happen to be someone that doesn't have a father, then just ignore the holiday and don't celebrate it.  There is no need to try to co-opt it and shove your 'daddy issues' in other people's faces.


#1: Angel Soft brand Toilet Paper:

This ad campaign apparently came out last year in 2017.  It shows a bunch of crybaby whiners complaining about how they didn't have a dad growing up so their moms did everything (no wonder they are so screwed up.  Allegedly most men in prison, most school shooters, and girls/boys with emotional problems were raised by single mothers).

Here some some screenshots of this freakshow:

These cretins are trying to play the victim but they are actually just perpetrating hatred against men in general and fathers in particular.


#2: LG brand (applicances and electronics) - India division

I don't know when this ad campaign came out but I only heard about it a few days ago. It shows a bunch of sniveling brats who have been told (coached and brainwashed) what to say by some demented man-haters.  One of them even says "my dad showed me how to shave my face because they shave their legs everyday - here meet my dad" - then he reveals his mother.

I consider this sort of social conditioning a form of child abuse, so maybe it's the parents who are mostly to blame (assuming the women in the video are actually the kid's parents and not just some actors rounded up by the LG marketing department).

They all think they are being so cute and so clever but really it's just nauseating.  Below are screenshots of these mentally enslaved zombies:

 freak

 derp

 dummy

 troll

In conclusion:

These commercials were cringe worthy and painful to watch.  However I'm glad I was made aware of them because I will NEVER EVER buy Angel Soft toilet paper again (that was my favorite brand of toilet paper and the one I always bought, unless I couldn't find it at the store). A couple of times I even went out of my way to buy it. But no more.

I bought a couple of LG appliances a few years ago. If I had known how LG felt about men I would not have purchased their products, but it's too late.  However, I will not buy any of their products in the future. In fact, if ever my current cell phone stopped working, I had planned on buying an LG cell phone. But no longer. I will choose another brand if I am ever in need of a new phone.

Looks like my choice of consumer goods is getting smaller and smaller each day.

But regardless, happy belated fathers day TO ALL THE REAL FATHERS (not the deadbeats and not the women pretending to be fathers).

@LGIndia
+LGIndia
www.LG.com
@LGUSAMobile
@LGUS
twitter.com/lgus

www.angelsoft.com
@AngelSoft

Taking off on the wrong foot . . .

An African-american man, Fredrick Joseph, was flying from Austin, Texas to Newark, New Jersey on United Airlines, March 13, 2018.

He posted a series of tweets about white privilege claiming that United Airlines offered the woman a $1000 voucher to put her feet down from the tray table, saying that a black person would not be treated the same way.  Online commenters chimed in, saying either that he was lying about the airline compensating the woman (that no company would ever pay for something like that), or that he was making a big deal out of nothing.

Regardless of whether or not United Airlines actually offered the woman $1000 (in order for her to behave like a decent human being) or that it demonstrates white privilege or not, this story highlights the sense of entitlement felt by women (thanks to feminism, and thanks to placing women on a pedestal by "traditional" males).

The disgusting female in question decided during the flight to remove her shoes and put her feet directly on the drop-down tray.

Besides the fact that this is extremely rude, uncouth, and obnoxious, I'm guessing one would probably be able to smell her feet (regardless of how clean they might be).

Mr. Joseph alleges that the woman initially had both her feet on the tray next to his.  When he protested, telling her that he was trying to eat but her feet were too close to his food, the woman responded that "the seats are small", and when he asked her to remove her feet from the tray, she called a stewardess and accused Mr. Joseph of "disrupting her flight".

Instead of asking the woman to comply, the stewardess allegedly told the woman that perhaps she could move her feet closer to the window or only put one of her feet up, to which the woman responded that she should be compensated for "accommodating" Mr. Joseph.

Even if the verbal exchange in Mr. Joseph's story cannot be confirmed, there is photographic evidence (pictured above) of this woman's rude behavior.

That's the idiocy of women.  Had it been a man acting this way (and compensated for it), it would have made it on the Huffington Post.

________________
@united
#FeminismIsCancer

Link and text from original article below:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-claims-united-airlines-offered-194538555.htm

Man Claims United Airlines Offered Woman $1,000 Voucher to Put Her Feet Down: 'The Audacity of White Privilege'

 James Tennent,Newsweek  |  March 14, 2018


A black man traveling on a United Airlines plane has claimed that a flight attendant agreed to give a white woman sitting next to him a $1,000 voucher for taking her feet off the tray table, while not offering him similar courtesy.

After his complaint went viral on Twitter, he called the company's response "tone deaf".
In a statement to Newsweek, United disputed the story, saying: "At no point was any customer offered compensation for this issue."

 “The audacity of white privilege,” Frederick Joseph, who started the ‘Black Panther Challenge’ fundraising initiative, wrote in a series of tweets on Tuesday March 13.

While on a flight from Austin, Texas, to Newark, New Jersey, Joseph said, a woman sitting next to him took off her shoes and placed her feet on the tray table. He shared a picture appearing to show a person’s foot on an airline table.

Joseph said that airline staff did not say anything despite walking past numerous times.
“I’m irate,” Frederick wrote, “because no black person would ever get away with this s--t.”

When it seemed like the staff would not take any action, Joseph said he decided to speak to the woman beside him. According to Joseph, he said “Ma’am, I’m trying to eat, and your feet are next to my food.”

“What do you want me to do?" the woman replied, according to Joseph. "The seats are small.”
 “I understand, which is why there is room for your feet and legs under the seat in front of you,” Joseph said he replied.

“This is why I fly first class, and I don’t come back here with everyone else,” the woman then allegedly said back. When Joseph then asked her if she would put her feet down, he said the woman called over a flight attendant and accused Joseph of “disrupting her flight” while she was “just trying to be comfortable.”

According to Joseph, the flight attendant suggested that the woman put her feet closer to the window or put one foot down, to which the woman replied: “If I put one foot down, I want to be accommodated for accommodating him.”

Speaking to Newsweek on the phone, Joseph said that the woman asked for a $1,000 voucher that had been offered by the airline prior to the flight for those willing to take a later plane. He said the attendant went to speak to someone else before returning and agreeing.

Shocked by this, Joseph said he asked the flight attendant “What voucher will I be receiving for my suffering?”

To which they allegedly replied “Sir, we can only make but so many accommodations, and she has agreed to move her feet for you.”

In an update on Wednesday, Joseph said he had recieved a call from United saying that the woman did not recieve any compensation. Joseph says that he told the respresentative: “I’m happy to hear that, but I still have an issue with the flight attendant pacifying her and essentially taking her side.”

Joseph says he told United that "the flight attendant created a negative situation for me and took her side" when the alleged offer took place. "I find it hard to believe that if this was a person of color someone wouldn’t have asked her to put her feet down," Joseph said he continued.

He then said that the respresentative identified themselves as "a Hispanic person" and said that they personally did not "believe it has anything to do with race or culture."

In his most recent tweet, Joseph said: "Basically, United had a woman w/ a Spanish sounding surname tell me there should be no issue because the woman ended up not getting money.
"Oh, and racial bias didn’t matter here, because again a woman with Spanish sounding name at United says it didn’t," adding, "Tone deaf."

In a statement to Newsweek, United Airlines said "At no point was any customer offered compensation for this issue, and we’ve talked with our customer to clarify this with him, and address his concerns. We want all of our customers to be treated with respect, and we do not tolerate discrimination of any kind."

Speaking to Newsweek, Joseph said that he did not feel he had been actively discriminated against but that "I do think there’s an underlying way in which white people are often pacified that people of color are just not."

"Even the woman on the phone for United saying 'we would have done the same thing for anybody', I just don’t believe that that’s true."

"United has said that there’s no voucher so she didn’t end up getting it," Joseph said, but he added, "even in the moment, if you’re not intending on giving her this, you’re still publicly pacifying it. Even if she never recieves a thing at all, it’s still a matter of... you have aligned yourself with what she’s saying and what she wants to do so you might as well just give her the money anyway because if it hadn’t gone viral I would have been home thinking this woman got this money."

Joseph's story created much conversation on Twitter, with a number of users commenting on the racial undertones they percieved and asking for United to comment or apologize. A number of users noted that it occured a day after United said they took "full responsibility" for a puppy which died when a flight attendant allegedly made the owner put the animal in the overhead compartment.

This article was first written by Newsweek

Racial Harmon-y

According to the Huffyton Boast (Huffington Post), a teenage woman made a false rape accusation, although fortunately no one was identified or arrested before she confessed to lying.

Breana Harmon (19) of Pottsboro, TX was reported missing when her car was found with the door open and some of her personal belongings scattered on the ground.  A few hours later she walked into a church wearing only her t-shirt, bra, and underwear, claiming she had been raped by 3 black males. Harmon is a white woman.

However, it turned out the lying skank had gotten into a fight with her fiancé, and was so upset she cut herself and her clothes.  She said she made up the rape story because she didn't want her family to be angry with her.

So this nasty woman actually thinks that her family being upset at her is somehow worse than accusing innocent people of rape. Wow. First World Problem.

Her scuzzy lawyer claims she was "remorseful" for what she did.  According to the 'news' article, falsifying  government documents in relation to kidnapping and sexual assault is a felony, but Harmon will see no jail time (instead, she will be given probation or community service).

Western women are the most privileged people in the world; they are so spoiled they think nothing of ruining other people's lives just to avoid getting in trouble.  You would have to be pampered and spoiled to think that mommy and daddy being angry with you is so bad that falsely accusing another person of a crime is somehow reasonable.

I was actually surprised that this article came out in the Huffyton Boast (I would think they would hide stories like this from the general public), until I realized that the accuser (criminal) was white and the accused (innocent victim) were black.  The Huffyton Boast is all about white on black crime (never the other way around, unless they can spin it somehow).

Had it been a black female that falsely accused white males of gang raping her (like the Duke Lacrosse scandal), or if it had been a white female accusing 3 white males of raping her, this story would have never made it on Huffyton Boast.  That is why they are Fake News.

Her fiancé should seriously reconsider being engaged to this nutjob. It might one day be him on the receiving end of her false accusations. Or one of his friends.

@HuffPost
#FakeNews
#FeminismIsCancer


________________________________________
Original Article and link below:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/no-jail-texas-teen-lied-202854635.html

No Jail For Texas Teen Who Lied About Being Raped By 3 Black Men

David Moye
HuffPost  •  February 27, 2018


A North Texas teenager who falsely claimed she was kidnapped and raped by three black men last March will likely serve no jail time.

On Thursday, 19-year-old Breana Harmon of Pottsboro pleaded guilty to four felony charges of tampering with physical evidence and government documents in relation to false reports of kidnapping and sexual assault.

“She’s very remorseful for what she did and what she said, and that’s why she decided to plead guilty,” Harmon’s attorney Bob Jarvis told the Sherman Herald Democrat. No suspects were ever identified or arrested in the case.

Harmon will be sentenced March 20. Her plea deal has two possible punishments: regular probation or deferred adjudication, which often involves fulfilling a requirement, such as treatment or community service. Neither involves jail time.

On March 8, 2017, Harmon was reported missing to the Denison Police Department after witnesses noticed the door to her vehicle was open with personal items, including a phone and keys, scattered on the ground.

A few hours later, Harmon walked into a church wearing only a shirt, bra and underwear. She said she had been kidnapped by three black males wearing ski masks, according to the Sherman Herald Democrat. Harmon claimed the men assaulted her and and that she was raped by two men while a third held her down.

Investigators noticed inconsistencies in Harmon’s story within in a few days. Medical workers didn’t find evidence she had been raped, and the holes in a pair of blue jeans discovered at the alleged crime scene didn’t match her injuries, according to the Dallas Morning News.

“The puzzle pieces just weren’t coming together,” Denison Police Chief Jay Burch said, according to the Morning News.

Harmon told police two weeks later that she made up the rape and that cuts on her body were self-inflicted.

She told officers that she was upset after she and her fiancé had been fighting, according to the Herald Democrat. Harmon said she cut herself and her clothes, then made up the rape story because she didn’t want her family to be angry with her.

Burch said Harmon’s false allegations have hurt the community, especially its African-American residents.

“Breana [Harmon’s] hoax was also insulting to our community and especially offensive to the African-American community due to her description of the so-called suspects in her hoax,” Burch said, according to the Herald Democrat. “The anger and hurt caused from such a hoax are difficult and all so unnecessary.”

•    This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Yoga Yetis

300 lbs women, err - About 300 women (i.e. harpies with too much time on their hands) took to the streets to protest a letter they saw in a local newspaper.

Alan Sorrentino, a 63-year old man from Barrinton, Rhode Island wrote a letter to the Barrington Times that stated, “To all yoga pant wearers, I struggle with my own physicality as I age. I don’t want to struggle with yours.  Yoga pants can be adorable on children and young women. However, on mature, adult women there is something bizarre and disturbing about the appearance they make in public. Yuck!”

Alan Sorrentino

Though I personally don’t believe his statement is 100% correct, I thought it was relatively harmless (and funny; after all, he also included a self-deprecating comment).  Not so to the attention-seeking, eternally-offended feminists, however.

The hateful response from these banshees was surprising (or not really, if you are familiar with feminazis).  The article states that “Jamie Burke, a 40-year-old mom of two, was so outraged by his letter that she organized a peaceful protest that marched right to Sorrentino's door.”

Peaceful?  Yeah right.  These corpulent cunts and their supporters left threatening messages on Mr. Sorrentino’s telephone, telling him to “watch his a*s*s” and “We're showing up to your house, you f**k!”.  He was also told his house would be vandalized.

Imagine if these kind of people protested outside your door – pretty intimidating, no?


So let’s turn this around.  Say it was a 63-year old woman who said older men should not be wearing sneakers because those are for young people, and all these men walked up to her house protesting and leaving threatening messages on her phone.  That would be considered “violence against women” and “sexist” by the media and the feminazis.

But when feminists do this to an old man, it’s considered acceptable.

Truly a sick society we live in.

Normally I would have supported the protesters’ views (because I don’t care what people wear, even if they look bad in it), however, because of their behavior and the way they handled this incident, I’m going to call them out.  I don’t like calling people names either, but they deserve it so here it goes:

These nasty bovine bitches need to get a life and need to grow a thicker skin.  The correct response would have been to simply ignore Mr. Sorrentino’s letter, or to write in a rebuttal letter to the newspaper.  But instead, these washed-up skanks decided to make a mountain out of a molehill.  This protest was entirely over the top and unnecessary (there are more important issues in the world that are in need of a protest).

'Outraged' mother of 2, Jamie Burke - LOL.

Here she is again: duh . . . my wittle feewings are hurt . . .boo hoo hoo :(

and here is the morning show cunt who thought the protest was a nice idea

300 losers picking on a single old man?  Yeah, you guys are really tough, aren’t you?  What a pathetic bunch of shrill hags.  I feel sorry for their kids (the ones who took their children on this mock crusade).  Nice parenting.  I hope all of them spill their latte’s on their yoga pants.

 Hashtag warriors.  LOL

You're 53?  That's nice.  Would you like a prize for participating in life, since you obviously wont' be getting the blue ribbon?

Mmm-hmm . . .

And finally, since the harpies in Rhode Island responded so caustically, I will respond in kind:

Pick your battles, people.  This particular one was not worth it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sisterhood-yoga-pants-protests-death-195000082.html

The United States Secret Cervix

 Julia Pierson, (former) Director of the Secret Service.

Nice "do", lady.  More like a don't.

On September 19, 2014, a 42-year old man broke into the White House.

Omar Gonzalez, an army veteran from the Iraq war, eluded various layers of security and was able to enter deep into the White house just minutes after the president and his family had taken off in a helicopter for a weekend getaway at Camp David.  Gonzalez was carrying a two and a half inch knife.

OG (Omar Gonzalez). This idiot thinks he's still in Iraq and
that Barack Hussein is the same as Saddam Hussein.


The intruder was able to run unobstructed across the entire White House lawn (70 yards), sprint up to the front door past a guard, then enter the building and run up two halls before being stopped just outside the “Green Room”, which is located right next to the oval office.

This is the furthest anyone has gotten inside the executive mansion (most jumpers are usually tackled by secret service men near the fence)

This debacle caused the FEMALE director of the Secret Service, Julia Pierson, to resign (she has been the only female director to date).  They had to bring in a retired MALE agent to temporarily replace her.

 Aww, Pooh!

Pierson had been named the director of the U.S. Secret Service in March 2013 by President Obama (in order to be politically correct).  The Secret Service Agency had been marred by scandal a year before, where men in the secret service slept with prostitutes while on a summit meeting in Colombia.

(But honestly, who cares? As long as it’s on their own time and they didn’t reveal any state secrets or endanger anyone, it’s nobody’s business).

This should be a hit with my female constituents . . .

Hiring a woman was suppose to “change the culture of the agency from a ‘boy’s club’ or‘frat house’ culture”.  People were hoping she would “change the male dominated service”.

(now, if someone had said we need more male schoolteachers to change the “female-dominated school system”, that would have been seen as sexist.  But for some reason, feminists and the politically-correct crowd see no problem with such statements if they are directed against men.  Bunch of hypocrites . . .)


While I do agree that those protecting the president should be of better character, the most important thing is being competent at your job.  If the president or a member of his family dies on your watch, nobody is going to care what swell upstanding people your agents are.  They aren’t going to care that your agents are feminists or that those agents care about ‘feelings’.  The people want to be assured that those protecting the president can kick some butt if the situation calls for it.  In the end, Julia Pierson lost the respect of those working under her, as well as the members of congress.

While you may not like the men in the sunglasses above, competence trumps political-correctness.


It also didn’t help that Pierson initially lied to the press and the president about the details of the incident.

During the congressional hearings, she oftentimes refused to answer questions directly.  It was also discovered during the hearings that under her tenure, an armed security contractor (who had a criminal past) had not been screened and was allowed to get on an elevator with the president during a trip in Atlanta.  In addition, during a different presidential trip in March, one secret service agent was found passed out drunk in front of the president’s room.

This isn’t quite the way to “clean house”.

The sad thing is, she looked good on paper.  She has many years of experience (having joined the secret service in 1983, and having served as the Secret Service’s chief of staff in 2008).  She also served on the protective details of the three previous presidents (Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr.).  It’s unfortunate.

Tokenism never works, at least not for long.

However, to be fair, everyone in the president’s security detail failed miserably that day.  Here’s the breakdown:



1.
The surveillance team outside the fence (who are suppose to warn agents inside the grounds about a break in, in order to give those agents a head start over the intruder), failed to notice Gonzalez.

2.
The alarm box at the front entrance had been turned off because the White House ushers were complaining that it was “too loud”.

(Well no shit, stupid – it’s suppose to be loud.  It’s an alarm.  I’m going to take a wild guess and say these ushers were female.)

 White House officials claimed the alarms boxes were malfunctioning and unnecessarily sounding off (but again, it’s the secret service’s job to get that fixed).  That’s a very poor excuse.

3.
The front door was left unlocked (because there was no alarm, the inside guard failed to close and lock the door in time).  There was also no guard outside the door (like there should have been)



4.
The ‘hounds’ were not released.

White House officials claim the guard dogs were not sent out because there were other people out (whom they didn’t want to get hurt).

(I have to ask: What is the point of having attack dogs if you don’t use them?  The White House always has security people (“Friendlies”) around the premises.  Are they all suppose to rush inside before the dogs can be released?  What if the intruder rushes in with them?  So dumb)

However, it was later revealed that the officer in charge of the guard dogs: 1) was on his personal cell phone, 2) did not have his earpiece in, and 3) also did not have his back-up radio on him (he had left it in his locker), so he was not aware of the breach and did not send out the attack dog.

5.
Agents, though armed, failed to shoot the suspect.  Gonzales brushed past an agent with a drawn gun near the entrance.


The intruder also managed to overpower and push his way past a FEMALE secret service agent inside the white house.  Authorities claim that “gender was not a factor”.

(I disagree. It would have been less likely for a man to be pushed over, due to men’s generally larger frames and muscle mass).

It took an off-duty secret service agent (he was leaving for the night) to notice Gonzalez and tackle him to the ground.  Thank goodness at least one guy (who wasn’t even suppose to be working since his shift was over) did HIS job properly.

Utter incompetence on the part of everyone else.

Political correctness in general, and feminism in particular, endangers lives.  Therefore, it has no place in critical jobs such as these (or any job for that matter).

If you can’t meet the requirements of the job, then you should find another job. If that female guard who was shoved aside does not pass the physical qualifications that men have to pass, she should be fired.  I also think the White House ushers and the guard in charge of the dogs should be fired.


Sources:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-fence-jumper-inquiry-reveals-multiple-secret/story?id=26899949

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fence-jumper-made-it-further-in-white-house-than-secret-service-let-on/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/01/politics/secret-service-director-resigns/

http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/29/white-house-fence-jumper-pushed-past-female-guard/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-intruder-was-tackled-by-off-duty-secret-service-agent/2014/09/30/052fb86c-48b4-11e4-b72e-d60a9229cc10_story.html