October 24, 2012

Huff-Post (I hate my husband)




This was one of the more depressing articles I have come across.  It was posted on the “Huffington Post” website by some woman (Iris Krackhead Krasnow) who thinks she makes a good marriage counselor and considers herself a writer.  Her post was written in response to a heartless cunt (named "Cindy") asking her for advice.

I don’t even have to criticize how god awful these two people are, as they do a pretty good job themselves.  I have broken down the article below (comments by original author (Iris) or poster (Cindy) are in italics, my response in plain text):


“I get hate mail like this using slightly different language several times a week. Substitute the word "hate" for "loathe", "despise", "can't stand" and occasionally, "wanna kill".”

You know if a guy said he hated/loathed/despised/can’t stand/wanted to kill his wife, he would branded a sexist sicko.  Yet women all over the world who read this are nodding their head in agreement.


“Plenty of wives think about divorce at least once a month, if not more, and manage to stay married for decades.”

So, the woman lying next to me in bed might just be pretending she loves me.  She may secretly (or not so secretly) loath me and wish I would go away forever.  Why don’t these gutless turds file for divorce if they hate us so much?


“Any woman married for longer than six months, if she is honest, knows the eggshell thin line that separates loving from loathing.”

Six months?  That’s all?  Are women really this bitter?  I don’t buy it.  Even I don’t think most married women are this bad (and this is coming from someone who has lost faith in women). But maybe I'm wrong.


“Any wife who is honest knows the compulsion to throw things, to hiss, to swear, to sit in the driveway in your bathrobe, engine running, sobbing.”

Men don’t normally have the luxury to do these sorts of silly things.  We have stuff to do, so I suggest that these ladies do the same.  FIX IT or DEAL WITH IT!



“What wife among you hasn't occasionally sucked down too much wine to numb the pain of grinding against the same person, in the same house, every day, for weeks, months, years?”

This comment is ridiculous on so many levels.  First it portrays women as drug addicts (yes, alcohol is a drug).  It is drug addicts who use drugs as an escape mechanism and emotional crutch.

Grinding” against the same person?  Your loving husband is the daily grind?  What a callous statement.  And talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  Maybe these women should be happy that somebody still cares about their tired, worn out ass.

OF COURSE it's going to be the “same person in the same house [day in day out]” – DUH!!!  Don’t you know that’s what marriage is?  The agreement to be with the same person forever!?  The agreement that you will no longer date others?  If you don’t want to see the same person every night then you should either stay single or behave like the nasty skank you are and have continual 1-night stands. Gross.


“Yet we stay married because the love out-muscles the hate in our relationships.”

First of all, there should not be ‘hate’.  Though we may not love everything about our mates, to hate means there is something inherently wrong.

Second of all, these types of women do not stay married because love ‘out-muscles the hate’ – they stay married because of intertia (they are comfortable) and because they don’t have the balls to get a divorce.


“I know from my own 24-year marriage and from the resilient women in The Secret Lives of Wives who have stuck it out for up to 60 years that marriage is ever-changing.”

I can’t believe this woman has remained married for so long.  I feel sorry for her husband.  He must be a total doormat or is entirely ignorant about how his wife feels about him.  The poor chap.

“Resilient woment”?  More like stubborn barnacles latched onto their husbands for fear of being swept away by life.  This author really is too generous to her (female) readers.  PATHETIC!


Of course this silly crackpot author seems like a saint compared to “Cindy”, the woman who wrote in complaining about her marriage.  This is what Cindy says (which is the attitude of many (if not most) women out there, married or not):
 
-“We seem to always be fighting . .  about the stupidest things
-“Sex is still, good, yes. But we don't have it very often. I find myself lusting after other men."”
-“I know I'm lucky to be married to someone sexy. Some of my friends don't go near their husbands.”
-“I wonder if [this hate] is a sign that there could be a better partner out there for me.”
-“Little things grate on me every day.”
-“My husband chews his food loudly. I hate his father.”
-“he [her husband] is a gentle man and a hands-on father.”
-“I have never been suspicious of him being with other women.”
-“He makes a good living, and that has enabled me to stay home with the kids.”
-"My hate comes from this feeling that I'm missing out on something else."
-“ Okay I admit I don't have any really big problems. So what about this sense of just feeling bored?"

So let me get this straight, Cindy (and all those women out there).  You are married to a faithful and devoted husband and family man who is still physically attractive and whom you have good sex with and who is also a gentleman.  And not only that, he makes enough money so you don’t have to work outside the home.  And it’s still not enough, because you are bored and think you are missing out on something better?!?!

Cindy - you are one of the most disgusting and repugnant beings on the face of the earth.  A loathsome abomination.  A base, detestable creature in human form.

(I would call you a blood-sucking succubus except that succubi always have sex with their victims.)


Then the author chimes in one last time.  This is what she says:

“In the early years of marriage, during my 30s and into my early-40s, I often longed for a different life. In my 50s, I am grateful for a predictable routine with the same husband who has helped me raise four interesting sons.”

Uh, she longed for a different life in her 30’s and 40’s because she was still young enough to get a date.  Now that her looks have faded in her 50’s and she realizes that her prospects for finding a new man are slim to nil, she decides that she is ‘grateful’ to have the old ball and chain around.  Nice try Krasnow, but we can see through your bullsh*t.


“Ever tell a sibling or a parent, 'I hate you'? Then, an hour later, you are hugging and wetting each other's faces with tears.”

Children and other immature people may tell their loved ones that they 'hate' them.  As an adult, I would never say that to a sibling or parent (unless I didn't love them).  I may hate some of the things they do, but in a loving relationship I would never personally hate a person.  I (and tons of people like me) are proof that hate and love do not depend on each other.  You can be full of both, but each is independent of the other.

This is truly a depressing (but not totally surprising) article.  To all the men reading this, please think long and hard if you are thinking about getting married.  More likely than not, this is what awaits you after “6 months” of marriage.  And for the rest of your married life.


Men, If you really want to get married go ahead.  If you are only getting married because “it’s the thing to do” then please DON’T GET MARRIED!!!!!!!!!  Don’t give these bitches a reason to walk all over you.

______________________________________
Original article is below:
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-krasnow/help-i-hate-my-husband_b_1229627.html)


Help! I Hate My Husband!'

by Iris Krasnow

Author, 'The Secret Lives of Wives: Women Share What It Really Takes To Stay Married'


"Help! I hate my husband."

This is how a letter starts in my Inbox today. It's from a 41-year-old woman named Cindy in Dallas who has been married for 12 years. I get hate mail like this using slightly different language several times a week. Substitute the word "hate" for "loathe", "despise", "can't stand" and occasionally, "wanna kill".

I always tell these women the same thing: You are definitely not alone. Plenty of wives feel this way. Plenty of wives think about divorce at least once a month, if not more, and manage to stay married for decades. My conclusions about the see-saw between hate and love come not as a psychologist or as a minister who counsels her flock. I am an author of five relationship books, including The Secret Lives of Wives, to whom women tend to tell all, about joy and sorrow and cheating and lying, about hot sex and no sex - and lots of dish in between.

Any woman married for longer than six months, if she is honest, knows the eggshell thin line that separates loving from loathing. The deeper the love, the deeper the potential to hate. Any wife who is honest knows the compulsion to throw things, to hiss, to swear, to sit in the driveway in your bathrobe, engine running, sobbing.

What wife among you hasn't occasionally sucked down too much wine to numb the pain of grinding against the same person, in the same house, every day, for weeks, months, years?

Yet we stay married because the love out-muscles the hate in our relationships. On those days we are socked under a gray malaise, we are suddenly lifted into the light as we walk by an old photo of the family, arms looped, heads pressed together, as if we are one big animal. And so it goes; happy some moments, miserable some moments, yet grounded in this flux of emotions by a fundamental commitment to each other, to the children, to forge onward.

I know from my own 24-year marriage and from the resilient women in The Secret Lives of Wives who have stuck it out for up to 60 years that marriage is ever-changing. Their own survival stories prove that periodic explosions can open up the channels to richer and stronger relationships.

I ended up having an hour-long email conversation with Cindy from Texas. She hit my heart. I felt her pain. I've been there, and persevered. Hopefully these snippets from our exchange will help you swing through the moods of hating toward loving, or at least toward liking him a lot, again.

From Cindy:
"At some point every week I feel like leaving him. When we got married I imagined this great life we would have together and instead we seem to always be fighting, about the kids, about the fact that he is so remote, about the stupidest things."

From me:
"Are you still attracted to him?"

From Cindy:
"Sex is still, good, yes. But we don't have it very often. I find myself lusting after other men."

From me:
"Have sex more often with your husband. Keep the lusting in your imagination unless you want a torn up heart and buckets of guilt. Fantasy can be way better than reality; take it from one married woman who told me how she took a hubba-hubba office mate to a nearby hotel. Once he took off his shirt she saw a back that was so hairy she couldn't even kiss him: As she put it: 'He was gorgeous in his suit and I should have left it at that.'

"Sorry if this offends because your husband has a hairy back. I'm sure he's adorable, but it wasn't this woman's taste.

From Cindy:
"No hairy back - don't like them either. I know I'm lucky to be married to someone sexy. Some of my friends don't go near their husbands. But this hate I feel, it simmers and I wonder if it's a sign that there could be a better partner out there for me. Little things grate on me every day. My husband chews his food loudly. I hate his father. I hate our domestic hum-drum. This can't be love!"

From me:
"Does he beat you? Is he gambling away all your money? Is he verbally abusive to you? Does he whack your children? Is he a philanderer?"

From Cindy:
"No, he's a gentle man and a hands-on father. I have never been suspicious of him being with other women. He makes a good living, and that has enabled me to stay home with the kids.
"My hate comes from this feeling that I'm missing out on something else."

From me:
"Here's what you are missing out on, according to some wives who write to me. How about the agony of finding out your husband is sleeping with your best girlfriend? Or, getting daily critiques from your husband that you are repulsive to look at and lazy? One woman shared with me how her husband grew so frustrated with their autistic five-year-old he tossed him across the room."

From Cindy:
"Yikes! Okay I admit I don't have any really big problems. So what about this sense of just feeling bored?"

Last one from me:
"In the early years of marriage, during my 30s and into my early-40s, I often longed for a different life. In my 50s, I am grateful for a predictable routine with the same husband who has helped me raise four interesting sons. We loathe and we love and we carry on. When boredom hits, I go drinking with my girlfriends.

"Could my life be better with someone new? Perhaps, until the new becomes old, which it inevitably does. Does my head get turned by chiseled men in well-cut suits? Yes. Then I remember that I don't want to necessarily see what's under those threads. Acting on lust often turns out not to be true love but to be true disappointment. It takes grit and prolonged intimacy to love deeply and hate deeply and thus is the rhythm of family relationships. Ever tell a sibling or a parent, 'I hate you'? Then, an hour later, you are hugging and wetting each other's faces with tears.

"It takes a lot of love to hate."

This blogger's book, The Secret Lives of Wives can be found here, and she can be found on: www.iriskrasnow.com

I-hate-men dot-org sucks balls



I stumbled across this article/website while doing a search on something completely unrelated.  The article is about as ridiculous as it is vile.

The article is titled "The Art of Hating Men" written by some cretin named 'Yolanda'.

I’ve broken the article down into separate parts and commented on it.  The original text is in italics; my response/comment is in plain text.  The complete original article
(http://www.ihatemen.org/2012/06/08/the-art-of-hating-men/) is at the very bottom (for posterity, in case the original author thinks the better of it and decides to delete it one day).

The article starts off like so:


“I’m a 23 year old female”
More like a 23 year old stuck-up prude who can’t get a date.


“I believe men should be hated, and i feel we haters should benefit from hating men.”
It doesn’t surprise me that she feels women should benefit from men in whatever twisted way she sees fit – that’s typical female gold digger mentality.


“I want to criticise the current manner at which we go about it.”
That’s another stereotypical female trait – complaining that something is not being done ‘right’ (i.e. her way).


“Hating men should be just about love relationships gone bad and how he broke your heart that is petty bitterness, its a good reason but where to from there how does that help us,”[sic]
This choppy excuse for a sentence confused me at first.  I think she meant “shouldn’t be about just love”.  I’ll ignore the rest of the bad spelling and grammar.


“we need to institutionalise our hate, we need to empower ourselves financially, socially and politically to back up our hatred for men”
Hmmm ; ;institutionalized hatred, financial/social/political empowerment to try and oppress another group of people – this sounds vaguely familiar . . . I think she’s the one who needs to be institutionalized.




“its not enough to hate them and be bitter but we need to stop trying to please them”
You’ve already succeed in that, honey.  It’s been a long time since any of you have pleased anyone (even yourselves).  So you’ll forgive us if we no longer feel like trying to please your sorry asses as well.


“[we need to stop] wanting them to marry us”
Yes please do.  The feeling is mutual.


“[we need to stop] cooking (slaving for them) for them”
You’d be doing us a favor (I’m amazed at some of the things the modern female tries to pass off as a homemade meal).  Sad that you think feeding your loved ones is akin to slavery.  Will you also stop cooking/'slaving' for your kids?


“hatred must be hatred and not be conflicted by serving the same people who abuse our kind”
hatred must be hatred – LOL.  Very deep (not).  So is this person asking that waitresses stop serving male customers in restaurants?  That female tellers not help male customers in a bank?  That female homeowners not hire male contractors/handymen to fix something that’s broken?  Good luck with all that.

(honestly she sounds like she’s 12 years old rather than 23)


“we should kill them in their sleep poison their food, sabotage, abort male babies and abuse male babies.”
And she says we’re the badguys?


“This is exactly what is happening to girl children around the world.”
Wrong.  This happens to all children (male and female).  I wonder what planet this ‘Yolanda’ person is from.


“The same contempt must be shown to women who love, support and defend men,”
That should not be hard to do.  Women hate on each other all the time – it comes very naturally to them.  But does she actually think the women on our (men) side care what she thinks of them?  They would probably take her contempt as a compliment.


“because it is women who perform female genital mutilation on other women”
Actually it is almost always performed on minors, not women.  I also find it funny that she equates supporting men with supporting FGM.  That’s quite a stretch.  This bitch is totally on crack.


it is mothers who teach their daughters how to be good servants for men”
Is that such a bad thing?  Is it bad for sons to be taught to defend women?  Scratch that.


“it is women who attend church in their numbers being the back bone of a religion that is the foundation of women oppression,”
Views on womens rights vary from religion to religion and even within the same religion.  Since this nutjob has no idea what she is talking about, she paints all churchgoers with the same brush.


“we need to evaluate our contribution to our own grief and the position we have found ourselves in”
True, since at least in the western world (where I’m pretty sure this ‘Yolanda’ character lives), women are usually the main contributors to their own unhappiness.


“yes progress has been made but we not where we would like to be”
If she considers reverting to base hatred as ‘progress’ then yeah I guess so.  Though I know where I would like them to be – as far away from me as possible!

Keep on truckin’, Yolanda.
 ___________________________________________________________ 
(original article in its entirety below):




The art of hating men

I’m a 23 year old female. I believe men should be hated, and i feel we haters should benefit from hating men. I want to criticise the current manner at which we go about it. Hating men should be just about love relationships gone bad and how he broke your heart that is petty bitterness, its a good reason but where to from there how does that help us, we need to institutionalise our hate, we need to empower ourselves financially, socially and politically to back up our hatred for men, its not enough to hate them and be bitter but we need to stop trying to please them, wanting them to marry us, cooking (slaving for them) for them, hatred must be hatred and not be conflicted by serving the same people who abuse our kind we should kill them in their sleep poison their food, sabotage, abort male babies and abuse male babies. This is exactly what is happening to girl children around the world. The same contempt must be shown to women who love, support and defend men, because it is women who perform female genital mutilation on other women, it is mothers who teach their daughters how to be good servants for men, it is women who attend church in their numbers being the back bone of a religion that is the foundation of women oppression, we need to evaluate our contribution to our own grief and the position we have found ourselves in, yes progress has been made but we not where we would like to be.

This post was submitted by Yolanda.


October 11, 2012

Where have all the good men gone - bad-ass-chick sucks




I always hear women complaining about “where have all the good men gone?”, so I did an internet search for this topic.  One of the first websites I came across was this pathetic excuse for an article on dating tips. 

I’ve broken the article down into separate parts and commented on it.  The original text is in italics; my response/comment is in plain text.  The complete original article
( http://www.badasschick.com/where-have-all-the-good-men-gone/ ) is at the very bottom (for posterity, in case the original author thinks the better of it and decides to delete it one day).


The article opens up like so:

“As a Badass Chick, you are an intelligent, independent, beautiful woman, confident in your sexuality”

This sounds like a very narrow demographic.  Though I’m sure most women have at least one of these traits, I’ll wager that a much smaller number of women have all of them.  Especially that last one.

I wonder if these women would be okay with a man being “independent” and “confident in his sexuality”.  Probably not – I think it would make them nervous.


“The underlying problem with The Dirty Seven [types of men] is a kind of selfishness that makes them incapable of giving your needs fair play. They lack empathy (the ability to put themselves in your shoes). They are looking for a relationship like you, but they are not capable of sustaining one.”

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  Why is it that when men talk about their needs, they are told to suck it up?  Where is “fair play” then?  How come women never put themselves in our shoes?  Probably because they could not walk a day in them.  They are so accustomed to getting their own way that they couldn’t hack it (when the going gets tough, it’s men who have to constantly set aside their comfort and needs for the greater good because that’s what society expects of them.  In general, women in this society aren’t raised that way, so they would have a hard time with it).


“I categorized the Dirty Seven the way the scientist or naturalist describes species of insects or birds.”

So she is basically comparing men to animals; something less than human; an unfeeling specimen.  Nice one, lady.


“Don’t give up your freedom and happiness for these guys.”

Don’t worry – the feeling is mutual.


“They will always put you and your needs second or last.”

See the recurring theme here?  It’s all about HER.  What a sense of entitlement!

Why should men put your needs before theirs?  What makes you so special?  You’re a big girl, you can take care of yourself.  I’m not going to jeopardize my health or my career for you (who would take you out to nice fancy dinners if I did?).


“1.  ScarMan: Talks continuously about his ex and the past, to the exclusion of everything else, including you.”

This is more of an issue with women than men I think.  Everyone should stay away from these kinds of people (men or women).


“2.  SideMan: Married or living with someone but looking for some excitement on the side, with no intention of creating a real relationship.”

Really?  Does this category need be included, as if women don’t already know this?  I think it goes without saying that these men are not looking for a serious monogamous relationship – DUH!!!
So much for being an “intelligent” woman . . .



(But, if women are just looking for something physical, these guys are the way to go.  They tend to be disease free, stable, and not psychopaths.  Despite the drawback of being in another relationship, they are still a better catch than some of the single weirdos out in the dating scene.  Sad, isn’t it?)


“3.  CrazyMan: Has so many quirks, a hospital wing of psychotherapists couldn’t figure him out. He’ll drive you nuts if you give him a long-term try, so don’t start with him.”

Great, now can you tell us what exactly makes him crazy? (I thought there’d be more to this paragraph, but it just ends like that; it doesn't elaborate on what makes someone crazy).  Is that all?  Just avoid lunatic men?  Thanks professor, I did not realize that.




“4.  GuyMan: Likes guys better than girls but pretends to be straight. The fact that he is lying to you about it is what makes him one of The Dirty Seven.  Let him go on his journey of discovering his true identity without you.”

Oh snap – she did not just say that!  Does this bitch actually think that if a guy wants to hang out with his male friends that makes him gay?!  OMG!! – what is this bitch smoking?!  So let me get this straight: a man is expected to spend every single waking hour with the woman, or the woman’s “needs” are not being met?  What a goddamn selfish ho.  And by the way, the “it’s either me or your friends – what’s it gonna be” ultimatum does not sit well with men.  I would strongly advise against putting a man in this predicament.

And no honey, he is not lying to you –he actually would rather hang around with his friends and do fun things than have to spend all this time with you having to mind his every little move/gesture and pretending to enjoy himself.  That doesn’t make him gay.

I do agree with the last statement, though.  Do both him and yourself a favor and let him go on his journey on his own.  He doesn’t need you to discover himself, and when he does, by that time hopefully he will have found a woman who is deserving of the man he’s become.


“5.  YAPpie: (Young And Poor) have the benefit of youth on their side but not much else: No money and no job prospects. You pay for everything and drive him around too.
Do less for him. He is a species of parasite that survives by living off of women and will move on.”

I have no issue with the first statement – nobody wants someone who is broke with no prospects.  Regarding the second statement however: “You pay for everything and drive him around too” – now you know how WE feel. God forbid we don’t have a car and so you wouldn’t even give us a second look.

The third statement is just plain wrong: “Do less for him”.  Really?  Nice one, lady.  How about just NOT dating him in the first place, jackass?  And they say men are jerks!!


“6 OLMan: (Old Loser Man) is the YAPpie, grown older but not wiser. He has not provided for his future. He is looking to you to do that for him. He was lazy, selfish, and clueless in his youth and has remained the same in his old age.”

This also goes without saying.  But what do you mean he has not provided for his future?  Are you suppose to look through his portfolio or bank statements?  How do you know he was a YAPpie as a youth?  For all we know he was young go getter who got disillusioned.  Or maybe he gave all his money away to charity.  Really, you don’t know if he was selfish or clueless as a youth.  Bitch be crazy!

And the last so-called person to avoid, according to the author:

“7.  BagMan: Difficult children from different marriages some of whom live with him, multiple alimony payments, and lots of bitterness over past woes are just some of the baggage this man brings to the relationship.”

This sounds like a special case of the first category (“scar man”).  Of course she had to throw in that jab about alimony – again the author betrays her real concern - money (more payments to others means less money left over for HER).

And as if all this nonsense wasn’t enough – her piece continues!  Will this bitch ever STFU?!



“The good mate thinks about the “us” before he thinks about himself.  The relationship is foremost in his life and he shows you that it is.”

Oh, NOW it’s about ‘The Relationship’.  I thought a relationship meant TWO people.  So shouldn’t someone who is committed put the needs of both rather than just one?  Because if one suffers doesn’t the other?  She totally contradicts herself.  From her tone (and especially from the first sentence), I still think “us” is really a euphemism for (it’s all about) “me”.


“His life is not about his miserable self, self, self and he wants to do something to make things better in the world instead of being a drain on the system.”

So men caring about themselves is “miserable”.  Now who’s the parasite? (see man #5 above).  Do you know what happens to a man when he doesn’t take care of himself?  He becomes sick and miserable. That’s what this parasitic author fails to notice.

I think we can all guess who the REAL drain on the system is - a fault-finding shopaholic.


“He takes care of himself because he has self-respect.”

Now she contradicts herself and says it’s acceptable for him to take care of himself.  Pathetic!!


“Money is not what motivates him”

No, but it’s what motivates women like the author.  So that’s why the man feels the need to make money.  Otherwise women won’t date him.


“His heart guides him.”

OMG this is SO LAME!!!  Can you get any more cliché!?!


“He lives his life with passion and is not a wound-licking victim or an ego-driven control freak.”

When you (women like the author) are through with him, he will be a passionless, wounded, shadow of his former self.  His ego will be destroyed.  Men Beware!!!


“He understands the territory of love and shares it with you.”

This is SO CHEESY!!!  What the hell does it even mean?


“He appreciates and respects you and you feel a warm glow of happiness when you think of him.”

Thbbbttt!! (chokes back a laugh).  Jack Handey could not come up with something better.  Notice how appreciation and respect are only expected from the male; all she has to do is sit back and ‘feel a warm glow of happiness’.  Blaahhh!!  What a lazy, entitled, selfish beeyotch!!!


Now she proceeds to name the counterparts of the men she listed above (by simply adding an ‘un-‘ prefix – the way a grade schooler would).


“The un-ScarMan: He is not stuck in the past and is here with you, now. He wants to learn about you because he is interested.”

HE wants to learn about YOU, because as we know, it’s all about her.  Who cares what his goals and interests are as long as he isn’t broke.


“The un-SideMan: He is devoted to you and not lots of chicks on the side. He puts his whole heart into your relationship.”

Who said ‘lots of chicks’?  A married man or a man living with someone usually only has one chick (maybe 2 if he’s a total player).  Unless he is a polygamist or is a serial dater (not cheating), most men don’t have time for that many women if they are living with another one already.

Notice how she says ‘HE puts HIS whole heart into “YOUR” relationship.  And what will the woman contribute?  I’m almost done with this article and I’m still waiting to find out.


“The un-CrazyMan: He has enough reference in reality to be able to share your world with enthusiasm. He is balanced and rational.”

As already stated, if you need to be told that someone not based in reality is not good “mate material” then you may need professional help yourself.


“The un-GuyMan: He is honest about his sexuality and loves you because you are a woman with a woman’s body.”

OMG give me a friggin’ break.  Enough with the gay-ness already.  This is the oldest trick in the book – calling a man gay to make him feel insecure so that he feels the need to prove his masculinity.  These sort of shame tactics are what feminazis use when arguing with men (you’re gay, you can’t get a date, you have a small penis, you live in your parent’s basement, etc.).  Nice try June Marshall, but no one is falling for it.


“The un-YAPpie: He can support himself and does not expect you to be a Sugar Mama. He has plans and goals for what he wants from life and how he wants to contribute to others.”

But do you expect him to be a sugar daddy?  And as far as the comment regarding ‘contributing to others’, by ‘others’ she means HER. (don’t forget man #7 and how alimony to others is bad)


“The un-OLMan: He has had a life vision and continues to work on it, even when he is up in years. He can support himself and stays young-at-heart, though he has the wisdom that comes with age and experience.”

She contradicts herself again.  According to #6 above ("OLMan"), she claims this person has grown older but not wiser.  Here, she claims that wisdom comes with age (and experience).  So which is it, stupid?  We’ll I’ll tell you: to quote an old roman proverb, “Wisdom comes NOT with age, but with good sense.”

Hopefully his age and experience has taught him to avoid gold-digging beeyotches like her.


“The un-BagMan: He might have some baggage, as everyone who has lived has, but he does not inflict it on you so that it takes over your life. He has handled it cleanly and fairly so that it does not keep coming back to haunt him and you.”

Well at least she agrees that everyone has baggage (at first she made it seem that anyone with baggage was not worth dating.  Or maybe she only meant MEN with baggage).  I’m actually surprised she ended her sentence with “him and you” (I was expecting only the “you”).


And the author ends her juvenile article with the following statement:

“Even the sex sours when you lose complete respect for a man. Assert your Badass Chickness and move on to someone who has the ability to really love you!”

Actually, the sex sours once the man commits.  Why do you think guys like #2 (above) exist?

And as far as ‘losing respect for a man’, it seems that many women never had any respect for them to begin with.  Pretty hard to lose something you never had.


So to sum up: June Marshall's article is complete bullshit.  I would advise women to ignore it and men to be wary of people like the author.


____________________________________________________________________________
(below is the original article, in its entirety, without my comments)





WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD MEN GONE?

As a Badass Chick, you are an intelligent, independent, beautiful woman, confident in your sexuality. But if you have been floating around on the dating scene, you might be asking yourself, “Where have all the good men gone?” From my many years of experience dating, mating, marrying, being friends with and divorcing men, I can tell you: It takes patience to find someone you can respect, whose heart is open to you, and you can be with without driving you up the wall.

Good mate-material is out there. But, while you are looking, don’t waste your time and money on The Dirty Seven. The Dirty Seven are dead-ends and no matter how much hope, love, and denial you throw in their direction, they won’t change. There’s have too much of a pay-off being the rotters they are.


Underlying Problem
The underlying problem with The Dirty Seven is a kind of selfishness that makes them incapable of giving your needs fair play. They lack empathy (the ability to put themselves in your shoes). They are looking for a relationship like you, but they are not capable of sustaining one.


Who are these Guys?
I categorized the Dirty Seven the way the scientist or naturalist describes species of insects or birds. They have stayed true to type for over twenty years of testing in the laboratory of society. Don’t give up your freedom and happiness for these guys. They will always put you and your needs second or last. Read for a brief description of who they are and what you can do about them.

1 ScarMan:
Talks continuously about his ex and the past, to the exclusion of everything else, including you. You feel like saying, “Hello! You are out with me!

If you want to feel first in a man’s heart, throw ScarMan back on the dating beach.

2 SideMan:
Married or living with someone but looking for some excitement on the side, with no intention of creating a real relationship.

Walk away and don’t look back. He wants to use you. If it takes a lie, he will lie to get what he wants, without a thought for the pain he causes. Divorce is expensive, he loves his kids, and he wants the best of both worlds. Don’t think he will leave his wife for you.

3 CrazyMan:
Has so many quirks, a hospital wing of psychotherapists couldn’t figure him out. He’ll drive you nuts if you give him a long-term try, so don’t start with him.

4 GuyMan:
Likes guys better than girls but pretends to be straight. The fact that he is lying to you about it is what makes him one of The Dirty Seven.
Let him go on his journey of discovering his true identity without you.

5 YAPpie:
(Young And Poor) have the benefit of youth on their side but not much else: No money and no job prospects. You pay for everything and drive him around too.
Do less for him. He is a species of parasite that survives by living off of women and will move on.

6 OLMan:
(Old Loser Man) is the YAPpie, grown older but not wiser. He has not provided for his future. He is looking to you to do that for him. He was lazy, selfish, and clueless in his youth and has remained the same in his old age.
Do not get involved with him until you find out where and how he lives. Go there with him. If he is penniless, especially beware of how he lives.

7 BagMan:
Difficult children from different marriages some of whom live with him, multiple alimony payments, and lots of bitterness over past woes are just some of the baggage this man brings to the relationship.
Give up on him before you are left holding the bag.


Good Guys
Let me reiterate, good guys are out there and are worth taking the time to find. The good mate thinks about the “us” before he thinks about himself. The relationship is foremost in his life and he shows you that it is. His life is not about his miserable self, self, self and he wants to do something to make things better in the world instead of being a drain on the system.

He takes care of himself because he has self-respect. Money is not what motivates him. His heart guides him. He lives his life with passion and is not a wound-licking victim or an ego-driven control freak. He understands the territory of love and shares it with you. He appreciates and respects you and you feel a warm glow of happiness when you think of him. He is the exact opposite of all of the Dirty Seven:
  • The un-ScarMan: He is not stuck in the past and is here with you, now. He wants to learn about you because he is interested.

  • The un-SideMan: He is devoted to you and not lots of chicks on the side. He puts his whole heart into your relationship.

  • The un-CrazyMan: He has enough reference in reality to be able to share your world with enthusiasm. He is balanced and rational.

  • The un-GuyMan: He is honest about his sexuality and loves you because you are a woman with a woman’s body.

  • The un-YAPpie: He can support himself and does not expect you to be a Sugar Mama. He has plans and goals for what he wants from life and how he wants to contribute to others.

  • The un-OLMan: He has had a life vision and continues to work on it, even when he is up in years. He can support himself and stays young-at-heart, though he has the wisdom that comes with age and experience.

  • The un-BagMan: He might have some baggage, as everyone who has lived has, but he does not inflict it on you so that it takes over your life. He has handled it cleanly and fairly so that it does not keep coming back to haunt him and you.

Be Badass
So don’t be a wimp when one of the Dirty Seven comes your way. Only women with low self-esteem fall for these guys, or continue on with them when they find out what they really are. The Dirty Seven don’t get better. They don’t even want to get better. The payoff for being selfish is great for them. Only the chick loses in this situation. Even the sex sours when you lose complete respect for a man. Assert your Badass Chickness and move on to someone who has the ability to really love you!

June Marshall - is author of The Dirty Seven: Ladies Beware.

_______________________________________________________________________

October 6, 2012

"who needs misandry dot tumblr" is LAME

I did an internet search on “misandry” and one of the first websites that showed up on the results page was the website "http://whoneedsmisandry.tumblr.com/".

This website is basically a bunch of posts by ugly, bitter females ranting about males and how horrible men are, etc. It’s a list of reasons why they think it’s o.k. to hate men. You know, the typical feminazi nonsense, such as:

“Me or all my female acquaintances have been raped all our life”
“I want the menz [sic] to feel uncomfortable and oppressed”
“Kill males”
“Because I hate myself”
“Because all men suck/are stupid and deserve to suffer (except for my significant other)”
“Guys don’t understand”
“I can’t stand male attention”
“Marriage is sexist”
“They think I’m dumb”


Occasionally there are some posts by self-hating males, but by and far most are by females.

The following are some of the gems you can find on this website:

  • “I need misandry because it’s the only thing I have to look forward to in the morning.”
  • “I need misandry because saying, 'god i hate women' can be tossed around like, lololol wateva is cool i know that feel, but say 'god i hate men' and suddenly everyone's down your throat.”
  • “I need misandry because my ex called me frigid when I could barely feel his 4-inch penis.”
  • “I need misandry because FUCK thanking and asspatting some gratuitous horseshit spewed from the face of cis, priveleged white men who think they *understand* the struggles of all women because "they've seen it firsthand." Be fucked; you will NEVER know, and don't presume you can fucking empathize.”
  • “I need misandry because he introduces me to people as his girlfriend before he tells them my name.”
  • “i need misandry because even when a man never says anything sexist or misogynist in front of me, i always wonder if he’s thinking it, or saying it once i’ve left the room”
  • “I need misandry because I am afraid to leave me house, and look both ways before leaving my porch because my rapist lives in my area, and he doesn’t even know he’s a rapist”
  • “I need misandry because i am fat and i refuse to lose weight to pacify/fit a dude's ideal of what is fuckable and what is not, because i like to fuck and i refuse to be a "good girl" and close my legs. i need misandry because my body is mine and i'll do what i damn well please with it and if you don't like it you can fuck off. i need misandry because people tell me i can't get mad when guys eye rape me and cat call me. i need misandry because fuck dudes”
  • “Lastly, if you identify yourself as male, your submission will not be published, however well-intentioned it is."


All I can say to this is, Bitches be crazy!