Happy (belated) Father's Day - feminists suck

Seems like feminazis (feminists) and stupid women in industry aren't content with making money and/or trying to provide a quality product - now they are trying to preach to us and brainwash us.

[and just to be clear - I don't mean all women in industry are stupid; I mean there are women in industry who happen to be stupid - there is a difference, but I have to put this disclaimer since people get confused because they don't think critically]

What makes this even more ridiculous is that their loony ideas have absolutely nothing to do with the product they are selling.

There is a 'hashtag' called "#HappyFathersDayMom".  The basic idea is that not everyone grows up with a father and so women supposedly have to play both roles.

First of all, moms are not dads. Besides the fact that females are not males and never can be (I'm talking to you, trangenders), females and males have different perspectives on things and often times approach things differently.

Being a single mom does not also make you a dad. It just makes you a mom that has to do way more work than you might normally do.

Second, it is callous and disrespectful.  I can't even imagine the outrage from feminists and women if somebody created a 'hashtag' called "HappyMothersDayDad".  It would be considered "sexist" and "an attack on women".  It would be accused of demeaning the role of mothers. But these politically-correct social justice warrior millennnial idiots are too dumb to see the irony in this.

If you happen to be someone that doesn't have a father, then just ignore the holiday and don't celebrate it.  There is no need to try to co-opt it and shove your 'daddy issues' in other people's faces.


#1: Angel Soft brand Toilet Paper:

This ad campaign apparently came out last year in 2017.  It shows a bunch of crybaby whiners complaining about how they didn't have a dad growing up so their moms did everything (no wonder they are so screwed up.  Allegedly most men in prison, most school shooters, and girls/boys with emotional problems were raised by single mothers).

Here some some screenshots of this freakshow:

These cretins are trying to play the victim but they are actually just perpetrating hatred against men in general and fathers in particular.


#2: LG brand (applicances and electronics) - India division

I don't know when this ad campaign came out but I only heard about it a few days ago. It shows a bunch of sniveling brats who have been told (coached and brainwashed) what to say by some demented man-haters.  One of them even says "my dad showed me how to shave my face because they shave their legs everyday - here meet my dad" - then he reveals his mother.

I consider this sort of social conditioning a form of child abuse, so maybe it's the parents who are mostly to blame (assuming the women in the video are actually the kid's parents and not just some actors rounded up by the LG marketing department).

They all think they are being so cute and so clever but really it's just nauseating.  Below are screenshots of these mentally enslaved zombies:

 freak

 derp

 dummy

 troll

In conclusion:

These commercials were cringe worthy and painful to watch.  However I'm glad I was made aware of them because I will NEVER EVER buy Angel Soft toilet paper again (that was my favorite brand of toilet paper and the one I always bought, unless I couldn't find it at the store). A couple of times I even went out of my way to buy it. But no more.

I bought a couple of LG appliances a few years ago. If I had known how LG felt about men I would not have purchased their products, but it's too late.  However, I will not buy any of their products in the future. In fact, if ever my current cell phone stopped working, I had planned on buying an LG cell phone. But no longer. I will choose another brand if I am ever in need of a new phone.

Looks like my choice of consumer goods is getting smaller and smaller each day.

But regardless, happy belated fathers day TO ALL THE REAL FATHERS (not the deadbeats and not the women pretending to be fathers).

@LGIndia
+LGIndia
www.LG.com
@LGUSAMobile
@LGUS
twitter.com/lgus

www.angelsoft.com
@AngelSoft

Racial Harmon-y

According to the Huffyton Boast (Huffington Post), a teenage woman made a false rape accusation, although fortunately no one was identified or arrested before she confessed to lying.

Breana Harmon (19) of Pottsboro, TX was reported missing when her car was found with the door open and some of her personal belongings scattered on the ground.  A few hours later she walked into a church wearing only her t-shirt, bra, and underwear, claiming she had been raped by 3 black males. Harmon is a white woman.

However, it turned out the lying skank had gotten into a fight with her fiancé, and was so upset she cut herself and her clothes.  She said she made up the rape story because she didn't want her family to be angry with her.

So this nasty woman actually thinks that her family being upset at her is somehow worse than accusing innocent people of rape. Wow. First World Problem.

Her scuzzy lawyer claims she was "remorseful" for what she did.  According to the 'news' article, falsifying  government documents in relation to kidnapping and sexual assault is a felony, but Harmon will see no jail time (instead, she will be given probation or community service).

Western women are the most privileged people in the world; they are so spoiled they think nothing of ruining other people's lives just to avoid getting in trouble.  You would have to be pampered and spoiled to think that mommy and daddy being angry with you is so bad that falsely accusing another person of a crime is somehow reasonable.

I was actually surprised that this article came out in the Huffyton Boast (I would think they would hide stories like this from the general public), until I realized that the accuser (criminal) was white and the accused (innocent victim) were black.  The Huffyton Boast is all about white on black crime (never the other way around, unless they can spin it somehow).

Had it been a black female that falsely accused white males of gang raping her (like the Duke Lacrosse scandal), or if it had been a white female accusing 3 white males of raping her, this story would have never made it on Huffyton Boast.  That is why they are Fake News.

Her fiancé should seriously reconsider being engaged to this nutjob. It might one day be him on the receiving end of her false accusations. Or one of his friends.

@HuffPost
#FakeNews
#FeminismIsCancer


________________________________________
Original Article and link below:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/no-jail-texas-teen-lied-202854635.html

No Jail For Texas Teen Who Lied About Being Raped By 3 Black Men

David Moye
HuffPost  •  February 27, 2018


A North Texas teenager who falsely claimed she was kidnapped and raped by three black men last March will likely serve no jail time.

On Thursday, 19-year-old Breana Harmon of Pottsboro pleaded guilty to four felony charges of tampering with physical evidence and government documents in relation to false reports of kidnapping and sexual assault.

“She’s very remorseful for what she did and what she said, and that’s why she decided to plead guilty,” Harmon’s attorney Bob Jarvis told the Sherman Herald Democrat. No suspects were ever identified or arrested in the case.

Harmon will be sentenced March 20. Her plea deal has two possible punishments: regular probation or deferred adjudication, which often involves fulfilling a requirement, such as treatment or community service. Neither involves jail time.

On March 8, 2017, Harmon was reported missing to the Denison Police Department after witnesses noticed the door to her vehicle was open with personal items, including a phone and keys, scattered on the ground.

A few hours later, Harmon walked into a church wearing only a shirt, bra and underwear. She said she had been kidnapped by three black males wearing ski masks, according to the Sherman Herald Democrat. Harmon claimed the men assaulted her and and that she was raped by two men while a third held her down.

Investigators noticed inconsistencies in Harmon’s story within in a few days. Medical workers didn’t find evidence she had been raped, and the holes in a pair of blue jeans discovered at the alleged crime scene didn’t match her injuries, according to the Dallas Morning News.

“The puzzle pieces just weren’t coming together,” Denison Police Chief Jay Burch said, according to the Morning News.

Harmon told police two weeks later that she made up the rape and that cuts on her body were self-inflicted.

She told officers that she was upset after she and her fiancé had been fighting, according to the Herald Democrat. Harmon said she cut herself and her clothes, then made up the rape story because she didn’t want her family to be angry with her.

Burch said Harmon’s false allegations have hurt the community, especially its African-American residents.

“Breana [Harmon’s] hoax was also insulting to our community and especially offensive to the African-American community due to her description of the so-called suspects in her hoax,” Burch said, according to the Herald Democrat. “The anger and hurt caused from such a hoax are difficult and all so unnecessary.”

•    This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

A day without a bitch: March 08, 2017

Seems like women can’t come up with their own ideas so they steal other people’s ideas.  The original was “A day without a Mexican”, the purpose being to show that Mexicans contribute to the economy more than is generally thought.

Or for example, after the movie “Kings of Comedy” came out, the womynz couldn’t leave it alone and had to come out with “Queens of Comedy” (however, to be fair, hispanic males had their own copycat moment and came out with the “LATIN Kings of Comedy”).

But, back to the copycat supplanter and main topic of this post:

First of all, most people ARE aware that women are important in the economy. I don’t think anyone with half a brain is under the delusion that women could just disappear from the workforce without anyone noticing.  Believe me, we notice.  We compete for jobs with you.  We see you putting on make-up while driving next to us on the way to work.  We feel it when you take maternity leave and the rest of us (men and single women) have to take up the slack.  Believe us, we know you [women] are an integral part of the economy.  Not sure what you are trying to prove here.

Second of all, it was mentioned on NPR, the Seattle Times, and other news outlets that it was also going to be a boycott of business “except for female AND MINORITY-OWNED business”.

Not only is that attitude messed up, it’s downright racist.

Imagine if South Africa, a black-ruled country where whites (male and female) are routinely harassed, decided to have a “day without whites”, where protesters would only support “white-owned businesses”?  The entire world would scream “racist boers! Apartheid supporters!” etc.  So I find it hypocritical that the same would not be said of this women’s protest.

Not to mention that the people who came up with this idea and who are supporting this protest are WHITE WOMEN.  Women whose father was white, a father who worked to put food on the table, who helped put them through school.  And this is how women show their gratitude?  That is pretty effed-up.

It also doesn’t make sense that they would support men of color (race and gender are two entirely different issues).  But feminazis don’t make sense so I’m not even going to try to understand their “reasoning”.  They hate men of color, too.  But I guess these feminists don’t want to appear “racist”.

Third of all:  It must be nice to just be able to not show up for work.  Unfortunately, many of us (women AND MEN) don’t have that luxury.  We aren’t all privileged upper middle class feminist prudes living off alimony.

Will female doctors and nurses not show up for work?  What if there is a medical emergency?  “Sorry, but your leg had to be amputated because we didn’t have enough medical personnel”.  Will female police officers not show up for work?  “Sorry, we couldn’t respond to that rape in progress – we were short on manpower, err, person power that day.”  Female electricians?  “Sorry but we wont’ be able to fix your internet until tomorrow” (now THAT would give these feminazi internet warriors a heart attack).

Of course the silver lining in all this is that men who show up for work won’t have to put up with women’s endless chatter and water cooler gossip, won’t have to put up with the haughty disdainful looks they get from women who walk past them in the hallways, and won’t have to walk on eggshells or watch their every little word or gesture lest they get reported to Human Resources for inadvertently offending women’s sensibilities.  For at least 1 day, some work can get done in peace.

For these reasons and others, this publicity stunt known as “day without a woman” is a stupid, asinine idea.  And idea created by hateful societal trolls.  Have fun tomorrow, losers.

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/northwest/day-without-a-woman-protest-sparks-debate-on-white-privilege/

http://fortune.com/2017/03/06/day-without-a-woman-strike-march-8/

 (that last objective is going to be a tough one!! LOL)

Yoga Yetis

300 lbs women, err - About 300 women (i.e. harpies with too much time on their hands) took to the streets to protest a letter they saw in a local newspaper.

Alan Sorrentino, a 63-year old man from Barrinton, Rhode Island wrote a letter to the Barrington Times that stated, “To all yoga pant wearers, I struggle with my own physicality as I age. I don’t want to struggle with yours.  Yoga pants can be adorable on children and young women. However, on mature, adult women there is something bizarre and disturbing about the appearance they make in public. Yuck!”

Alan Sorrentino

Though I personally don’t believe his statement is 100% correct, I thought it was relatively harmless (and funny; after all, he also included a self-deprecating comment).  Not so to the attention-seeking, eternally-offended feminists, however.

The hateful response from these banshees was surprising (or not really, if you are familiar with feminazis).  The article states that “Jamie Burke, a 40-year-old mom of two, was so outraged by his letter that she organized a peaceful protest that marched right to Sorrentino's door.”

Peaceful?  Yeah right.  These corpulent cunts and their supporters left threatening messages on Mr. Sorrentino’s telephone, telling him to “watch his a*s*s” and “We're showing up to your house, you f**k!”.  He was also told his house would be vandalized.

Imagine if these kind of people protested outside your door – pretty intimidating, no?


So let’s turn this around.  Say it was a 63-year old woman who said older men should not be wearing sneakers because those are for young people, and all these men walked up to her house protesting and leaving threatening messages on her phone.  That would be considered “violence against women” and “sexist” by the media and the feminazis.

But when feminists do this to an old man, it’s considered acceptable.

Truly a sick society we live in.

Normally I would have supported the protesters’ views (because I don’t care what people wear, even if they look bad in it), however, because of their behavior and the way they handled this incident, I’m going to call them out.  I don’t like calling people names either, but they deserve it so here it goes:

These nasty bovine bitches need to get a life and need to grow a thicker skin.  The correct response would have been to simply ignore Mr. Sorrentino’s letter, or to write in a rebuttal letter to the newspaper.  But instead, these washed-up skanks decided to make a mountain out of a molehill.  This protest was entirely over the top and unnecessary (there are more important issues in the world that are in need of a protest).

'Outraged' mother of 2, Jamie Burke - LOL.

Here she is again: duh . . . my wittle feewings are hurt . . .boo hoo hoo :(

and here is the morning show cunt who thought the protest was a nice idea

300 losers picking on a single old man?  Yeah, you guys are really tough, aren’t you?  What a pathetic bunch of shrill hags.  I feel sorry for their kids (the ones who took their children on this mock crusade).  Nice parenting.  I hope all of them spill their latte’s on their yoga pants.

 Hashtag warriors.  LOL

You're 53?  That's nice.  Would you like a prize for participating in life, since you obviously wont' be getting the blue ribbon?

Mmm-hmm . . .

And finally, since the harpies in Rhode Island responded so caustically, I will respond in kind:

Pick your battles, people.  This particular one was not worth it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sisterhood-yoga-pants-protests-death-195000082.html

WOW! (war on women)

North Korea


Feminists claim there is some sort of “War on Women”.  However, I don’t see the government sending soldiers out in order to capture and detain women.  I don’t see any paramilitary groups shooting at women or locking them up.  I don’t see death squads or groups of “irregulars” pulling women out of homes and executing them.’

What is this “War on Women” I keep hearing about?  I don’t see any of those things happening when I step outside of my home on my way to work or to the grocery store.

Am I just blind?  It can’t be that.  I just went to the optometrist a couple of weeks ago and my eyesight hasn’t changed.

If anything, I see people bending over backwards to prove to each other that they “support women” (as if nobody in the world supported them before, ever).  I see movies making it a point of having so-called “strong female leads”.  I see the media fawning over successful “women entrepreneurs”.  I even see people making excuses for bad things women do (things that would not be tolerated from a male).  I see women-only gyms, women-only clubs, etc.

Hmmm . . .  Are feminists living in some sort of fourth dimension or alternate universe?  Or am I?

I might write more on this subject in another post, but I just wanted to throw that out there.

Katy Perry

Home Alone: Burned in New York

Now, I know that the first thing women will say is "where was the father? that deadbeat must have left them."  Or they might say "Poor single working mom - goes easy on her".

Blah blah blah blah.  Save it, ladies.

Somehow she strikes me as the type of person who KNEW BEFOREHAND she should not have gotten pregnant with Mr. Absentee's kid but did so anyway.  Furthermore, if she's working as a stripper that means she probably didn't have good employment prospects to begin with (which means she was aware she could not support a child).

Regardless of her particular situation, what kind of a shitty parent leaves their 2-year old kid alone like that?

Of course if it was a guy who had done this, he probably would have been charged with manslaughter instead of 'reckless endangerment'.  That's our good old feminized justice system at work.


Below is the article from People Magazine:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/apartment-fire-kills-2-old-225001758.html
________________________________________________________

Apartment Fire Kills 2-Year-Old Daughter of Exotic Dancer Left Home Alone

staff@people.com (Chris Harris),People – February 24, 2016

Police have arrested the mother of a 2-year-old girl who died in a raging fire that consumed parts of her apartment building in Brooklyn, New York, on Tuesday morning.

A New York City Police Department spokeswoman tells PEOPLE that Leila Aquino, 20, has been charged with reckless endangerment and child endangerment.

Sources close to the investigation allege Aquino went to work on Tuesday morning, leaving her daughter – 2-year-old Kaleenah Muldrow – home alone. PEOPLE's sources claim that Aquino is an exotic dancer, employed by a New York City gentleman's club.

Firefighters were called to the scene of Tuesday's fire at around 7:30 a.m., and found Kaleenah after extinguishing the fire.

Police sources say the girl's remains were discovered under a scorched bed, where investigators believe the child tried to hide from the rising flames.

Police claim Aquino returned to the gutted building at around 9:45 a.m.

Tuesday's fatal fire is being investigated as a possible arson.

Aquino is being held without bail and it was unclear Wednesday if she has retained legal counsel.

Women are better than men? I don't think so.

Just for fun, I did a google search for "women are better than men". One of the first articles that came up was some lightweight piece in Cosmopolitan Magazine called "14 Things Women Do Better Than Men".
( http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/advice/g1711/women-better-than-men-things/ )

I have listed all 14 points they made (in italics), with my comments in plain text.  The first picture is one that was actually embedded in the article.



14 Things Women Do Better Than Men
By Christie Griffin

It's almost 9:30 and the inbox looks as bad as the outbox. I guess women are better procrastinators than men. And why is the clock facing outward?

"We're still annoyed at the recent study that found men throw better than women (we know puh-lenty of women who can out-throw men). That said, there are tons of studies proving women have some amazing abilities that men lack. So, we rounded up some of our favorites. Hello, ego boost!"

Really, you’re STILL annoyed about that?
And who are the "plenty of women who can outthrow men"??? Pray tell.
Anyway, that's just ONE thing men are better at.  Are you guys (gals) so insecure that you feel the need to rattle off 14 things in response?  Ha ha. Losers.


"1. We learn better.
A study done at the University of Georgia and Columbia University found that women are better learners—basically, we have a better approach to expanding our minds. And, according to researchers, women tend to be more attentive, flexible, and organized. So at work, you're more likely to understand the task at hand better than your male coworker. Booyah."

If you actually read the article they are referring to, it’s a lightweight, “1-minute read” that even admits it is not talking about cognitive skills, but rather talks about behavior in the classroom (“which may lead teachers to give girls higher grades than boys.”).

Darn - this pencil mustache is going to cost me an A+!!!

"2. We're smarter.
According to a study of IQ tests from around the world, women have higher IQs than men. Researcher James Flynn checked out the IQs of people from the U.S., Europe, Canada, New Zealand, Argentine, and Estonia, and found that women came out on top. Score."

According to the article, this is the first time in 100 years that this has happened. I think we need to test for 100 years more before we draw such conclusions (to account for any variability). Just sayin’.

But if it's true, then we should expect to see more life-changing inventions by females. Or will we only see upper managers like Sheryl Sandberg and Carly Fiorina taking up space on this earth?  I guess time will tell.

"3. We're cleaner.
A study from San Diego State University of offices across the U.S. found that men’s desks and offices are germier than women's. Researchers discovered that men had anywhere from 10 to 20 percent more bacteria in their workspaces than women—and scientists say it's because they tend to be less hygenic. Ick."

Probably true in general (but not in my experience). Although, what they failed to mention is that the original article (a lightweight article from “Livescience”.com) also stated that in addition to men possibly being less hygienic, men also tend to be bigger than women (and so have a greater surface area for bacteria to shed from). This was conveniently left out of the cosmo article.

Tssk Tssk, Christie Griffin. I guess women are also better at hiding things (like facts?)

Plus, have you ever looked inside a woman’s purse? Gross.


"4. We interview better.
A new study out of the University of Western Ontario found that women are better at handling the stress of a job interview. Researchers found that, while women get more freaked beforehand about interviewing, we do better in the actual event. Why? We prepare more before the big moment."

So basically, women freak out before the interview, and men freak out during the interview.  This one seems like a wash. Or maybe not.

I wonder if a pencil mustache will jump start this interview . . .

The link to the original article was dead (but it was another (possibly lightweight) article from “Livescience”, just like #3 above).


"5. We evolve hotter.
A recent study revealed that women are getting better looking through evolution; meanwhile, men are staying the same. After following more than 2,000 people through four decades of life, the study showed that attractive women had 16 percent more children than average-looking chicks and that beautiful people are 36 percent more likely to have a daughter as their firstborn. All those gorgeous daughters mean more beautiful women than in past generations."

That means with each generation, males can mate with increasingly more attractive females, while women have to keep on settling for the same type of men. I think we all know who the real winner is in this case. HA!

hot gal, ugly guy

"6. We survive car accidents more often.
This is sad but true: Men are 77 percent more likely to die in a car accident than women, according to a study done by Carnegie Mellon University. Our boyfriends should be thanking us when we nag them to 'Wear your seatbelt!'"

There is no link to the original article, and the Cosmo article above does not mention if the fact that men drive more than women was taken into account.  Obviously if you drive more, the chances of you dying in a car accident are greatly increased (duh!)

"7. We're better at seeking comfort.
A Mind survey of 2,000 people revealed that women are far more likely than men to talk through their problems. Fifty-three percent of women talk to their friends about what's stressing them out, as opposed to 29 percent of men"

This is not a surprise. Women need to be constantly comforted for every little thing.  Men don’t have that luxury.  On the flip side however, men are better at sucking it up. SNAP!


"8. We're more recession-proof.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 80 percent of those who have lost their jobs since December 2007 have been men. Ouch. This could be because male-dominated fields have been hit the hardest, like manufacturing and finance. That really sucks...but hey, maybe it's time more men became nurses and educators."

I wouldn’t say that has anything to do with women being inherently “better” (it has more to do with economics).  But I will concede that women have been hit less hard regarding the recession.  But aren’t women always complaining about how there aren’t enough women in traditionally ‘male dominated fields’?  Instead of gloating, these bitches should be thankful that it’s us and not them. Just saying.


"9. We graduate college more often.
We already know that female enrollment is higher than male, but the Department of Education's statistics reveal that men are also less likely than women to graduate and get their bachelor's degrees. Men are also more likely to take longer than five years to complete their degree."

(is it because we enroll in more difficult majors?)  Regardless, we still only hear about girls needing 'help' and 'role models' and 'programs' to help them succeed.  We never hear the same for boys.  Is it just me or is something wrong this picture?

"10. We eat healthier.
A survey of more than 14,000 people, conducted by the University of Minnesota, showed that women choose far healthier foods than men. While men are more likely to chow down on frozen pizza and red meat, women are piling fruits and veggies onto their plates. It all sounds pretty obvious, but we get so much grief for our chocolate addictions that we just had to point this one out!"

There is no link to the study, but this one is not a surprise.  One point for women (wheeeee!!!)

"11. We have stronger immune systems.
No wonder men act like such babies when they have a sniffle — women really do have stronger immune systems than men! If there are little battles going on in our bodies, women have a secret weapon: estrogen. A study done by McGill University indicated that estrogen gives women an edge when it comes to fighting off infections. That's because estrogen confronts a certain enzyme that often hinders the body's first line of defense against bacteria and viruses."

There is no link to the so-called 'study', though I don’t know of any men that act like babies when they have a sniffle (it takes being sick as a dog to act that way).  Too bad their allegedly superior immune system can’t do anything about their periods!!! (if you really want to see someone acting like a baby, or a total beeyotch).

Though in my experience, women seem to call in sick more than men do.


"12. We live longer.
Among the world's population of those who are over 100 years old, 85 percent are women, according to the New England Centenarian Study. In general, women continue to live five to 10 years longer than men as well."

Mother nature is sexist. Or is it something else?

"13. We're better managers, especially in this economy.
This one is a little controversial, but a slew of experts are confident that women make greater bosses because they are better listeners, mentors, problem solvers, and multitaskers than their male counterparts. In a recent Daily News article, management expert Jay Forte said, 'It's a very service-oriented economy [right now], so you need employees to be motivated. Women are better connectors than men and more astute about knowing how to activate passion in their employees.'"

A little controversial? How about a lot!  There is no link to the study (so I’m not sure who the “slew of experts” really is).  Speaking purely from my own experience, there appears to be no difference (I’ve had great male and female bosses, and bad male and female bosses).

Not to mention other controversial findings where even women prefer to work with men.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/01/why-dont-more-women-want-to-work-with-other-women/283216/

Nice try, though.


"14. We invest better.
A study of 100,000 portfolios showed that women's investment returns outperform men's, 18 percent to 11 percent. This could be because women are typically more cautious with their investment decisions and think longer term."

18 versus 11 percent seems like quite a stretch, but the link is dead, so I can’t confirm it.  Too bad they aren’t more cautious or take the ‘long view’ with their dating choices!!

Women win. Or do they?