November 23, 2016

The United States Secret Cervix


 Julia Pierson, (former) Director of the Secret Service.
Nice "do", lady.  More like a don't.


On September 19, 2014, a 42-year old man broke into the White House.

Omar Gonzalez, an army veteran from the Iraq war, eluded various layers of security and was able to enter deep into the White house just minutes after the president and his family had taken off in a helicopter for a weekend getaway at Camp David.  Gonzalez was carrying a two and a half inch knife.

OG (Omar Gonzalez). This idiot thinks he's still in Iraq and
that Barack Hussein is the same as Saddam Hussein.


The intruder was able to run unobstructed across the entire White House lawn (70 yards), sprint up to the front door past a guard, then enter the building and run up two halls before being stopped just outside the “Green Room”, which is located right next to the oval office.

This is the furthest anyone has gotten inside the executive mansion (most jumpers are usually tackled by secret service men near the fence)

This debacle caused the FEMALE director of the Secret Service, Julia Pierson, to resign (she has been the only female director to date).  They had to bring in a retired MALE agent to temporarily replace her.

 Aww, Pooh!


Pierson had been named the director of the U.S. Secret Service in March 2013 by President Obama (in order to be politically correct).  The Secret Service Agency had been marred by scandal a year before, where men in the secret service slept with prostitutes while on a summit meeting in Colombia.

(But honestly, who cares? As long as it’s on their own time and they didn’t reveal any state secrets or endanger anyone, it’s nobody’s business).

This should be a hit with my female constituents . . .


Hiring a woman was suppose to “change the culture of the agency from a ‘boy’s club’ or‘frat house’ culture”.  People were hoping she would “change the male dominated service”.

(now, if someone had said we need more male schoolteachers to change the “female-dominated school system”, that would have been seen as sexist.  But for some reason, feminists and the politically-correct crowd see no problem with such statements if they are directed against men.  Bunch of hypocrites . . .)



While I do agree that those protecting the president should be of better character, the most important thing is being competent at your job.  If the president or a member of his family dies on your watch, nobody is going to care what swell upstanding people your agents are.  They aren’t going to care that your agents are feminists or that those agents care about ‘feelings’.  The people want to be assured that those protecting the president can kick some butt if the situation calls for it.  In the end, Julia Pierson lost the respect of those working under her, as well as the members of congress.


While you may not like the men in the sunglasses above, competence trumps political-correctness.


It also didn’t help that Pierson initially lied to the press and the president about the details of the incident.

During the congressional hearings, she oftentimes refused to answer questions directly.  It was also discovered during the hearings that under her tenure, an armed security contractor (who had a criminal past) had not been screened and was allowed to get on an elevator with the president during a trip in Atlanta.  In addition, during a different presidential trip in March, one secret service agent was found passed out drunk in front of the president’s room.

This isn’t quite the way to “clean house”.

The sad thing is, she looked good on paper.  She has many years of experience (having joined the secret service in 1983, and having served as the Secret Service’s chief of staff in 2008).  She also served on the protective details of the three previous presidents (Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr.).  It’s unfortunate.

Tokenism never works, at least not for long.


However, to be fair, everyone in the president’s security detail failed miserably that day.  Here’s the breakdown:



1.
The surveillance team outside the fence (who are suppose to warn agents inside the grounds about a break in, in order to give those agents a head start over the intruder), failed to notice Gonzalez.




2.
The alarm box at the front entrance had been turned off because the White House ushers were complaining that it was “too loud”.

(Well no shit, stupid – it’s suppose to be loud.  It’s an alarm.  I’m going to take a wild guess and say these ushers were female.)

 White House officials claimed the alarms boxes were malfunctioning and unnecessarily sounding off (but again, it’s the secret service’s job to get that fixed).  That’s a very poor excuse.



3.
The front door was left unlocked (because there was no alarm, the inside guard failed to close and lock the door in time).  There was also no guard outside the door (like there should have been)



4.
The ‘hounds’ were not released.

White House officials claim the guard dogs were not sent out because there were other people out (whom they didn’t want to get hurt).

(I have to ask: What is the point of having attack dogs if you don’t use them?  The White House always has security people (“Friendlies”) around the premises.  Are they all suppose to rush inside before the dogs can be released?  What if the intruder rushes in with them?  So dumb)

However, it was later revealed that the officer in charge of the guard dogs: 1) was on his personal cell phone, 2) did not have his earpiece in, and 3) also did not have his back-up radio on him (he had left it in his locker), so he was not aware of the breach and did not send out the attack dog.



5.
Agents, though armed, failed to shoot the suspect.  Gonzales brushed past an agent with a drawn gun near the entrance.


The intruder also managed to overpower and push his way past a FEMALE secret service agent inside the white house.  Authorities claim that “gender was not a factor”.

(I disagree. It would have been less likely for a man to be pushed over, due to men’s generally larger frames and muscle mass).




It took an off-duty secret service agent (he was leaving for the night) to notice Gonzalez and tackle him to the ground.  Thank goodness at least one guy (who wasn’t even suppose to be working since his shift was over) did HIS job properly.

Utter incompetence on the part of everyone else.

Political correctness in general, and feminism in particular, endangers lives.  Therefore, it has no place in critical jobs such as these (or any job for that matter).

If you can’t meet the requirements of the job, then you should find another job. If that female guard who was shoved aside does not pass the physical qualifications that men have to pass, she should be fired.  I also think the White House ushers and the guard in charge of the dogs should be fired.


Sources:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-fence-jumper-inquiry-reveals-multiple-secret/story?id=26899949





September 21, 2016

Gina McCarthy and the EPA (part 2): No use crying over spilled wastewater

Read My Lips: The U.S. Government did NOT try to dupe the Indians, again - You can trust me!


More from Gina McCarthy, the administrator for the U.S. Environmental Pollution Protection Agency (EPA)

I posted previously about her role in the Flint Water crisis.  Apparently that was not her only rodeo.

The Gold King Mine spill:

On August 5, 2015, an EPA-led crew uncorked 1 MILLION* gallons of contaminated orange wastewater during a mine clean-up project.  The contamination spread from Cement Creek and into the Animas River in Colorado, then poured into the San Juan River in New Mexico, which runs through the Navajo Nation, and also runs toward Lake Powell in Utah.  Three state governors declared a state of emergency.

Aw, f**k!  Not again!

A congressional hearing was called by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, but McCarthy refused to provide witnesses for the hearing.  This prompted the committee to issue her a subpoena.

According to the article, “The committee members blasted the EPA for its lack of cooperation in aiding the panel in its oversight role on the Aug. 5 spill”.

The committee chairman, John Barrasso stated:
I am troubled further that the EPA would disregard such failures and attempt to avoid the responsibility by refusing to appear before the committee and answer questions; this sort of behavior is unbecoming of any federal official and won’t be tolerated.”

Although McCarthy says her office continues to cooperate with the committees, the committee members have said the EPA has been unresponsive to their requests for information.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, the Navajo Nation has accused the EPA of pressuring the Native Americans to waive their rights to future compensation (possibly by offering immediate reimbursements).  According to the Navajo President, Russell Begaye, EPA workers were going door to door on his reservation asking residents to sign claim forms appearing to waive their rights.

Begaye stated that EPA workers were approaching elderly Navajo farmers and ranchers who may not speak English as their first language and might have a difficult time understanding the form.

Gina McCarthy has called the water spill accident “a heartbreaking situation for the EPA”.  I think she may have meant bank-breaking.

This accident could have been avoided.  At the very least, the EPA could have given their full and immediate cooperation to the congressional investigation.  They did not.

So there you have it. If women ran the world.

Up Yours, Utah!  Same to the rest of you!!


_____________________________________
Sources:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/13/epa-mccarthy-subpoenaed-testify-gold-king-spill/



*The Washington Times article from April 13 states in the main article that 3 million gallons were spilled, but the accompanying photo caption says 1 million gallons.  Another source (not listed) also said it was 1 million, so that is the figure I used for my post (the Washington Times text might be a typographical error).



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/13/epa-denies-navajo-pressure-to-waive-rights-to-futu/





Go Red Sox!!!!

September 20, 2016

Gina McCarthy and the EPA: Dense as lead



(brainless) Head of the EPA, Gina McCarthy

It has often been said that “if women ran the world . . .” things would be better, because women are supposedly more “moral” (blah blah blah).

So let’s take a look at the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Gina McCarthy (a woman) is the current Administrator (head) of the EPA (she had been appointed as assistant administrator of the EPA Office of Air and Radiation in 2009 by President Obama).

She (along with Michigan Governor Rick Snyder) were the subject of a Congressional Hearing.

She has been implicated in the Flint Water crisis, where the City of Flint, MI had switched over from treated drinking water to an untreated water source in order to save money.  It was eventually discovered that the water was tainted with lead.  Residents, especially children, suffered health problems due to lead poisoning.

I'll beat this rap . . .

The EPA, under the leadership of McCarthy, did nothing.  An internal EPA report listing concerns about lead levels in the water was ignored for months.  And what was McCarthy’s response to this?

Because of the complexity of lead, we did not and could not have made a concerted judgment about whether it was a systemic problem."

Really, McCarthy?  What a load of BS.

McCarthy then added that the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) had told the EPA that they had implemented corrosion controls in Flint, when they hadn't actually done so.  According to McCarthy:

In hindsight, we should not have been so trusting of the State for so long when they provided us with overly simplistic assurances of technical compliance rather than substantive responses to our growing concerns.”
We were strong-armed, we were misled, we were kept at arm's length, we couldn't do our jobs effectively.”

Strong-armed?  Really?  You are the EPA, a Federal Agency, and you were ‘strong-armed’ by a state agency who (according to McCarthy) has a strong relationship with the EPA? (her own words as per the transcript from the congressional hearings).  So the EPA couldn’t send someone out there to test the water or ask questions?


I tried but they wouldn't listen! Aaaaaaahhhhhh!!!

She then goes on to say:

Although EPA regional staff repeatedly urged the MDEQ to address the lack of corrosion control [which results in lead from pipes leaching into the water], we missed the opportunity late last summer to quickly get EPA’s concerns on the public’s radar screen.”

What does she mean “we missed the opportunity late last summer”?  Does the EPA only make announcements during summer vacation?  Do they go back to school in the fall or something?  Do the seasons prevent them from making announcements?

Honest to god this bitch woman is so full of BS.

Even after this fiasco, the idiot White House continues to stand by her.  Maybe since they had to fire their (female) head of the Secret Service (Julia Pierson) relatively recently (October 2014), they didn't want to appear "anti-woman" (I'll write about Pierson in another post).  So even though this must be a major embarrassment for the White House, she still gets to keep her job.

Nyaah-Nyaah!  You can't make me resign!



 _______________________________

Another woman, the (former) director of the EPA’s Midwest regional office (located in Chicago), Susan Hedman, defended the actions of the EPA.  Speaking at a congressional hearing, she stated:

"I don't think anyone at EPA did anything wrong, but I do believe we could have done more."


Susan Headless Hedman, former regional head for the EPA.  She don't look too happy . . .

According to the scientist who exposed the water problem in Flint, Hedman ignored or downplayed his warnings regarding the dangerously high levels of lead in the drinking water.

Susan Heder in a canoe- Maybe she should try canoeing in the waters of Flint, Michigan



Here are the people who McCarthy, Heder, Rick Snyder, and all others like them betrayed:


McCarthy taking advantage of a photo op with a Black Child (African-Americans make up the largest ethnic group in Flint, MI).  Hopefully the poor child isn't dying of lead exposure on her couch.



Again, just to be clear (for those feminist dolts out there): I am not saying that men are necessarily better than women; I am simply saying that women are no better than men.  Ergo, there would be no improvement in world affairs if women were in charge.

__________________________________________________________________
Sources:

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/03/17/470792212/watch-michigan-gov-rick-snyder-testifies-on-the-flint-water-crisis



http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/midwest/ct-epa-flint-water-crisis-20160315-story.html


 Text of official Transcript of Gina McCarthy's statement at congressional hearing:

Testimony of Gina McCarthy
Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
March 17, 2016

Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Cummings, distinguished Members of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify about EPA’s response to the drinking water crisis in Flint, Michigan.

I want to start by saying what happened in Flint should not have happened and can never happen again. The crisis we’re seeing was the result of a state-appointed emergency manager deciding that the City would stop purchasing treated drinking water and instead switch to an untreated source to save money. The State of Michigan approved that decision, and did so without requiring corrosion control treatment. Without corrosion control, lead from pipes, fittings and fixtures can leach into the drinking water. These decisions resulted in Flint residents being exposed to dangerously high levels of lead.


Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, Congress gives states the primary responsibility to enforce drinking water rules for the nation’s approximately 152,000 water systems, but EPA has oversight authority. Typically, EPA has a strong relationship with states under the Act. But looking back on Flint, from day one, the state provided our regional office with confusing, incomplete and incorrect information. Their interactions with us were intransigent, misleading and contentious. As a result, EPA staff were unable to understand the potential scope of the lead problem until a year after the switch and had insufficient information to indicate a systemic lead problem until mid-summer of 2015.


While EPA did not cause the lead problem, in hindsight, we should not have been so trusting of the State for so long when they provided us with overly simplistic assurances of technical compliance rather than substantive responses to our growing concerns. Although EPA regional staff repeatedly urged the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, or MDEQ, to address the lack of corrosion control, we missed the opportunity late last summer to quickly get EPA’s concerns on the public’s radar screen.


Since October, EPA has been providing technical advice to the City. Additionally, an EPA response team of scientists, water quality experts, community involvement coordinators, and support staff has been on the ground every day since late January. EPA’s efforts are part of a broader Federal response to the community, led by the Department of Health and Human Services. The EPA team has visited hundreds of homes and collected thousands of samples to assess the City’s water system. We’re encouraged by these test results, but our enhanced efforts with Flint will continue until the system is fully back on track.

We’ve also been engaging Flint residents - visiting places of worship, schools, libraries, community centers, and senior living facilities - to hear their concerns and share information.


I have also taken several concrete steps at the agency to address some of the systemic issues raised during this crisis. I directed a review of MDEQ and its ability to implement the Safe Drinking Water Act. I called on EPA’s inspector general to investigate EPA’s response to the Flint crisis. I issued an EPA-wide elevation memo encouraging staff to raise issues of concern to managers and managers to be welcoming of staff concerns and questions. I also recently sent letters to every governor and every state environmental and health commissioner in the country asking them to work with EPA on infrastructure investments, transparency, technology, oversight, risk assessment, and public education. And I have asked the states to join EPA in taking action to strengthen our safe drinking water programs, to ensure drinking water programs are working for our communities. Additionally, we are actively working on revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule.


While the contours of this situation are unique, the underlying circumstances that allowed it to happen are not. As a country, we have a systemic problem of underinvestment in “environmental justice” communities. Not only are these underserved populations more vulnerable to the health impacts of pollution, but they often lack the tools and resources to do something about it. That’s what stacks the deck against a city like Flint. That’s what creates an environment where a crisis like this can happen.


There are many missteps along the way that can tip the scales toward a crisis. In many areas across our country, water infrastructure is aging, it is antiquated, and it is severely underfunded – particularly in low-income communities, which may have the most difficulty securing traditional funding through rate increases or municipal bonds. This threatens citizens’ access to safe drinking water. We need to start having a serious conversation about how we advance the technologies and investments necessary to deliver clean water to American families.


I’m personally committed to doing everything possible to make sure a crisis like this never happens again. But EPA can’t do it alone. We need the cooperation of our colleagues at every level of Government and beyond. Thank you and I look forward to answering your questions.


July 5, 2016

Baby Batters Boyfriend

Independence Day 2016, Daytona Beach, Florida:  A woman got into a fight with her boyfriend and hit him with her baby.

18-year old Tatyana Allen struck her boyfriend with her 6-month old child during an altercation they had on the beach.  The baby was taken to the hospital as a precaution, but according to officials was not injured.

Life's a beach. Or is it bitch?

_________________________

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-woman-used-baby-to-batter-boyfriend-florida/

Sources:http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2016/7/4/woman_uses_baby_to_b.html

Windixie

A University of South Carolina student was caught trying to poison her roommates.

22-year old Haley King was secretly videotaped pouring Windex and spitting into her two roommate's food.  The roommates had been having problems with King, and were trying to get her to move out (unsuccessfully).  Because of previous altercations they suspected she (King) might be engaging in malicious behavior, and set up a video camera in their apartment.

The southern belle was arrested by Columbia Police, then released on bail the next day.

________________________
source:
https://gma.yahoo.com/sc-college-student-allegedly-caught-camera-poisoning-roommates-205959707--abc-news-topstories.html#


May 6, 2016

Total Downer

An Adoptive"mother" from Birmingham, England has been sentenced to life in prison (minimum 18 years) for the beating death of a toddler.

Kandyce Downer, 35, had been beating 18-month old Keegan Downer (formerly known as Shi-Anne Rose) over the course of a few months.

Overall, Keegan’s body had more than 200 separate injuries, which included 153 scars, abrasions and bruises.  Other injuries included a spinal leg fracture (which would have made the slightest movement agony), seven broken ribs, and severe head injuries (of which the resulting scar tissue was preventing the brain from growing, stunting Keegan's development).

The toddler had been beaten so violently that "she resembled a car crash victim".  During the court hearing, the judge stated that "Keegan suffered considerably in the last days and months of her life".  Forensic officers had found 80 blood splatters near Keegan's cot.

The toddler had originally been taken from her heroin-addicted mother (a distant relative of Downer), after which Downer was given legal guardianship of the toddler.

Prior to gaining custody of Keegan, Downer had tried to adopt Keegan's older sister, but was unsuccessful (thank heavens for that).

Downer, who has 4 other children, had left Keegan alone at home for 2 hours to take another child to a wedding rehearsal, during which time Keegan suffered a cardiac arrest and collapsed in her cot.  Downer came home to find her unconscious.

Before calling emergency help, Downer tried to get rid of the evidence by dumping Keegan's blood-stained mattress near a large garbage container (dumpster, or skip), but she was recorded on CCTV.  Afterwards, she even tried to blame her teenage son for Keegan’s death after claiming most of the ‘day-to-day’ care was down to him and her three younger children.

Keegan was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital, her death attributed to a combination of head injuries, septicemia (blood infection) and blunt chest trauma.

It never ceases to amaze me what people will do for money (she was getting £125-a-week maintenance payments from the government).  Why should taxpayers pay for a baby to be tortured?

____________________________________
Sources: 









April 19, 2016

Bitch's Cauldron

An evil stepmother (no, not a Grimm fairy tale, but a real grim story) killed her husband's son by placing him in scalding water.

In the Cincinnati, Ohio area, 25-year old Anna Ritchie allegedly put a 4-year old (Austin Derreck Cooper) into 134 degree water for almost half an hour. By the time he was let out, he was so burned that his skin was falling off, and he was bleeding.

However, I have suspicions about this story.  According to story in the Washington Post (source below), The father, Robert Ritchie (no, not Kid Rock) was allegedly unaware of what had happened, and that though the child was crying through the night he never got up to check up on the child because he was told "not to check on him" by his wife.

Really?  You're just going to ignore a crying child just because your wife tells you to?  He is either lying or a bad father.

I feel sorry for the 'poor oppressed woman' - NOT.

__________
Source: